<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Raising Digital Kids &#187; silverssummit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robinraskin.com/blog/category/silverssummit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robinraskin.com/blog</link>
	<description>No one said it would be easy but it sure keeps you thinking.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Chatroulette: An Intergenerational Tour</title>
		<link>http://www.robinraskin.com/blog/2010/03/19/chatroulette-an-intergenerational-tour/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robinraskin.com/blog/2010/03/19/chatroulette-an-intergenerational-tour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[internet safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[silverssummit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[50+]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[chatroulette]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robinraskin.com/blog/?p=794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!-- GООООООО -->A 55-year-old woman in broad daylight has no business visiting Chatroulette, where the population seems to be restricted to 18- to 30-year-old hormonally charged boys on the other side of the world.
For those who don’t know, Chatroulette is the latest form of social media—social voyeurism. You sit (or not) in front of your PC’s webcam. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 55-year-old woman in broad daylight has no business visiting Chatroulette, where the population seems to be restricted to 18- to 30-year-old hormonally charged boys on the other side of the world.</p>
<p>For those who don’t know, Chatroulette is the latest form of social media—social voyeurism. You sit (or not) in front of your PC’s webcam. You appear in small box on the lower left of the screen. On top of you appears a blank black box. Press F9 and you’re put in contact with a random stranger (literally named stranger). You can romp through these one-on-ones with complete strangers and move on to the next whenever you get the urge.</p>
<div id="attachment_795" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-795" title="Chatroulette" src="http://www.robinraskin.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/chatroulette-1-300x187.jpg" alt="Chatroulette" width="300" height="187" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Chatroulette</p></div>
<p>Of course there are rumors about Chatroulette. While I only encountered one in the act of masturbating in front of his webcam, it was the topic of conversation for most of the others.<span id="more-794"></span></p>
<p>At four in the afternoon East Coast time, I found myself transported to bedrooms in Wales, the UK, and Australia. Impassive young men stared blankly into their webcams.</p>
<p>Stranger 1: I swear this guy just had a photo of himself as a place marker. I don’t know if he would have showed his face if I’d been more his type, but I got no movement—not even an eye blink in response to my friendly waving.</p>
<p>Stranger 2: A sweet 20-something in a tie-dyed shirt and big headphones. Willing to talk. Said he liked to chat but that there were far too many naked guys jerking off in front of their cams for his taste. When I said it was time for me to move on, he teased that “he liked older women and that I should stay a while.“ It was my Mrs. Robinson moment on Chatroulette.</p>
<p>Strangers 3 and 4: They whipped right past me before I even knew what hit me. They must have decided that they didn’t care for my looks before I even registered their presence.</p>
<p>Stranger 5: Had a really cool LCD projector in his room. I thought that he was standing in front of an outdoor billboard. Not too cool on my part.</p>
<p>Stranger 6: A guy who looked a bit closer to me in age. He was from France. Then my phone rang. It was my daughter, who is probably older than most of the guys I’d been talking to. I felt totally weird and told the Frenchman I had leave.</p>
<p>Stranger 7: Wow a girl…at least I think it was a girl. She vanished so quickly all I saw was a waiflike body and some shoulder-length hair.</p>
<p>Stranger 8: Finally, the moment I’d feared but also sought out, arrived. Eight clicks into Chatroulette and I had my first naked masturbator. The camera was nowhere near his face; his pants were down around his knees. I had the feeling of interrupting something very private.</p>
<p>According to the Huffington Post, Chatroulette is 13% pervert, 89% male, and 47% American. Well, two out three ain’t bad. I did not meet an American (or one who would ‘fess up to being an American) in my Chatroulette travels. I met no people of color, no Asians.</p>
<p>I won’t be going back to Chatroulette anytime soon. In comparison, it made what little I can remember of the singles bar scene seem like an enlightened place. Without reading too much into my sub one-minute encounters, there was something sad.</p>
<p>And now that I’ve learned that Chatroulette maps, a mashup that lets you locate the people you’re talking to by tracking the location of their IP address, can put your photo on its big board, that’s enough for me. Voyeurism in the name of research is not my game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robinraskin.com/blog/2010/03/19/chatroulette-an-intergenerational-tour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raskin Joins AIPatHome Advisory Team</title>
		<link>http://www.robinraskin.com/blog/2009/11/30/aipathome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robinraskin.com/blog/2009/11/30/aipathome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Your Digital Home]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[boomers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seniors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[silverssummit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[aging in place]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Raskin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robinraskin.com/blog/?p=667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AIP stands for Aging in Place, and as boomers age, or find themselves with aging parents, you&#8217;re going to hear more about how to use technology to allow folks to live in their own homes longer. Whether it&#8217;s a televisit for the doctors or a motion ssensor that detects a fall, there are many roads to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 11pt;">AIP stands for Aging in Place, and as boomers age, or find themselves with aging parents, you&#8217;re going to hear more about how to use technology to allow folks to live in their own homes longer. Whether it&#8217;s a televisit for the doctors or a motion ssensor that detects a fall, there are many roads to aging in place. For more info see <a title="AIPatHome" href="http://aipathome.com">AIPatHome.com</a>.<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robinraskin.com/blog/2009/11/30/aipathome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It’s DTV Anarchy Out There</title>
		<link>http://www.robinraskin.com/blog/2009/02/19/it%e2%80%99s-dtv-anarchy-out-there/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robinraskin.com/blog/2009/02/19/it%e2%80%99s-dtv-anarchy-out-there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Your Digital Home]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[legal issues]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[silverssummit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robinraskin.com/blog/2009/02/19/it%e2%80%99s-dtv-anarchy-out-there/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month I predicted that the government, in the true spirit of  “why do today what you can put off until tomorrow”  would vote to postpone the national transition to a digital TV signal, &#8220;DTV transition,&#8221; until June. They agreed to delay because millions of consumers weren’t ready (physically or mentally) to make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNoSpacing"><font face="Calibri"><a href="http://www.robinraskin.com/blog/2009/01/31/digital-tv-transition-goes-bipolar/" title="DTV Transition">Last month </a>I predicted that the government, in the true spirit of  “why do today what you can put off until tomorrow” <span> </span>would vote to postpone the national transition to a digital TV signal, &#8220;DTV transition,&#8221; until June. They agreed to delay because millions of consumers weren’t ready (physically or mentally) to make the switch. And because the government (no kidding) had seriously underestimated when they budgeted dollars in the form of coupons to help consumers who applied to purchase digital converters to offset the cost of the transition.<span id="more-289"></span></font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">While the consumers were slowly waking up to the fact that their TVs would go dark, the TV stations were chomping at the bit to pull the switch. The stations have been investing in new digital towers, in educating their viewers, and in advertising and preparing for the switch for years. <span> </span>That’s the reason that over 400 stations have ignored the delay and have already transitioned to a digital-only signal. The bill that was passed, which specified the delay, offered stations that wanted to go digital  a chance to do it earlier if they had FCC permission. As of this week, about 25% of the nation&#8217;s broadcast stations were granted permission and have launched their digital programming. <span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"><span> </span></span>Consumers who are waiting until  the June cutoff date are going to have to catch up on the favorite programs they&#8217;ve missed. With some stations switching and some waiting, we&#8217;ve got digital TV anarchy.</font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri">One report says that four million customers are still waiting for their $40 government-funded coupons to help pay for their digital transition. A Nielson study found that five million Americans are not ready for the transition to digital. The highest number of unprepared live in the Albuquerque/Santa Fe area. Hawaii, on the other end of the spectrum, went ahead and managed a statewide switch well in advance of any national cutoff date.<span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"> </span></font><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"><font face="Calibri"> </font></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"><font face="Calibri">Maybe trying to change the entire country’s TV infrastructure on one day was silly <span> </span>idea from the onset?  Perhaps a more regional rollout would have been more sensible? <span> </span>As it stands, we’ve got digital TV anarchy. Anarchy usually winds up costing us all in one way or another.<span>  </span>We may need  to start looking at a DTV bailout before we&#8217;re through.<span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"></span></font><font face="Calibri"> </font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNoSpacing"><font face="Calibri">Confused about which of your favorite stations jumped the deadline?<span>  </span></font></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNoSpacing"><font face="Calibri"><span>On the government-sponsored <a href="http://dtv.gov" title="DTV Transition">DTV Transition website</a> the following notice appears:</span></font></p>
<blockquote>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNoSpacing"><font face="Calibri"><span><em>Some of the TV stations in the US will transition from analog to digital broadcasting on Feb 17th. The remaining stations will transition from analog to digital broadcasting between Mar 14th and Jun 12th.</em></span></font></p>
</blockquote>
<p><font face="Calibri"><span></span><a href="http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/02-18-2009/0004974518&amp;EDATE=" title="AARP">AARP </a>(</font><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'">877-698-806) and <span> </span>the <a href="http://fcc.gov" title="FCC">FCC </a>(1-800-CALL-FCC) have both set up hotlines to get you through</span><span style="font-size: 9.5pt; color: black"><font face="Calibri">. </font></span><font face="Calibri"> </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robinraskin.com/blog/2009/02/19/it%e2%80%99s-dtv-anarchy-out-there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

